Peter Zhang has completed a significant empirical project on disclosure norms: I scraped the wikis (during off-hours) of every season starting 2014. … I collected the […]
Guest author Martin Sigalow defines and defends "judge-applied rules," which are a form of limited, structured judge intervention, as a practice and strategy.
To kick off a new series, Bob discusses a way affs that want to read a plan can read an 'example' instead, dodging semantics-based topicality concerns.
After the first major tournaments on Nov/Dec our new Associate Editor, Kenan Anderson, breaks down what affirmatives are dominating the metagame and how affirmatives are, and aren't, interpreting this resolution.
The topic for today is what to make of arguments like “your interpretation X leads to Y bad thing” and the common response “but you could read theory on Y bad thing.” Bob likes the former (sometimes) but the latter never.
Bob challenges the use of abbreviated arguments or "enthymemes" in contemporary kritik debate. On his view, they discourage innovation and clash, exclude debaters, and emphasize the judge's knowledge over the skill of the debaters.
The latest edition of 10 Things celebrates TOC 2018, including record breakers, flexibility, new affs, neg win rates, a critique of the topic metagame, and many shout-outs.