July 8, 2016
In this edition of The Meta, Bob rehearses some common arguments for disclosure in more depth by imagining the same debate in a world with disclosure and a world without it. He then moves on to tackle Martin Sigalow's recent blog post in opposition to disclosure.
March 17, 2016
In this edition of The Meta, Bob rehearses some common arguments for disclosure in more depth by imagining the same debate in a world with disclosure and a world without it. He then moves on to tackle Martin Sigalow's recent blog post in opposition to disclosure.
March 8, 2016
In this edition of The Meta, Bob takes up Chris Palmer's idea that all theory arguments must contain interpretation evidence, AKA theory advocates. He also rambles on about why theory isn't exclusionary.
February 28, 2016
Bob discusses Marshall's position on spikes and why it might be too quick to dismiss them as not contributing to 'better debating.'
January 23, 2016
Bob continues his discussion of modesty applied to ROBs by dealing with objections raised to his recent article by Christian Chessman.
December 30, 2015
By Bob Overing 1 – S’quo or No I watched an octas debate at the Glenbrooks this year between Ollie Sussman from Cambridge Rindge and Latin […]
November 14, 2015
Premier Debate co-Director Bob Overing has recently released a copy of the paper he presented at the 2015 Alta Conference on Argumentation. He argues for a view […]
October 6, 2015
In this edition of The Meta, Bob considers and rejects arguments for a paradigmatic stance against disclosure theory.
September 10, 2015
John and Bob employ arguments for pragmatics and argumentative inclusion in response to Nebel and Branse.
September 5, 2015
August 28, 2015
Bob says internal links from common theory standards to common voters are self-evident, needing no justification.
March 31, 2015
Bob discusses how we might use intuitions in LD theory debates.
